Skip to main content

Centre wants to create war hysteria over Pulwama attack before elections, says Mamata Banerjee

scroll.in: The West Bengal chief minister claimed her party will win all 42 of the state’s Lok Sabha seats.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee Monday accused the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government of not acting on information that could have prevented the deaths of security personnel in the Pulwama attack. Forty Central Reserve Police Force jawans had lost their lives in the attack in Jammu and Kashmir on February 14, which was claimed by Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed.

The Trinamool Congress chief claimed the Centre was “playing politics over the dead bodies of jawans” instead. She made the accusations at her party’s extended core committee meeting in Kolkata.

Banerjee claimed that the Bharatiya Janata Party-led government wanted to create war hysteria and help it score votes in the Lok Sabha polls. “The central government was aware that such an attack can take place, there were intelligence inputs,” Banerjee alleged. “Then why didn’t the government take action to protect our jawans. The government allowed them to die.”

She alleged that Union ministers were not being taken into confidence during the decision-making process. “This government is being run by two brothers [Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP President Amit Shah] who have blood of innocents on their hands,” she said. “Our party workers and cadre should be cautious as efforts are on to tamper electronic voting machines during the Lok Sabha polls. You all have to thwart those efforts.”

The chief minister also claimed that the Trinamool Congress will win all the 42 seats in the Lok Sabha polls in West Bengal.

Banerjee and the BJP have been at odds over several matters in the recent past, including since January, when her state police allegedly refused to cooperate with the Central Bureau of Investigation in a case and had detained the CBI officers instead.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's biggest authorized porn industry.

INDIA Today: India's biggest authorized porn industry. Who are exploring Indian women, Indian culture & life through out the world. Pardon me for sharing all these porn pics. But these are from website of AajTak - India's No 1 Hindi channel of India Today Group .....

The Erosion of Democracy: BJP's Stranglehold on Indian Politics

In recent times, India has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic institutions being manipulated and opposition voices being silenced under the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The use of government agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and Income Tax Department (IT) to target opposition leaders has raised serious questions about the health of democracy in the country. The blatant misuse of these agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents undermines the very foundation of democracy. By incarcerating opposition leaders and subjecting them to legal harassment, the BJP government is effectively crushing dissent and monopolizing power. Such tactics not only weaken the democratic fabric of the nation but also erode public trust in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. Furthermore, the stranglehold of the BJP government extends to the media, with reports of censorship and suppression becoming incre

Unmasking the Dark Veil of Electoral Bonds: The Lingering Shadow of Black Money in Indian Politics

By S.B. Mazumder In the convoluted saga of political financing in India, electoral bonds emerged as a promising solution, yet they only served to veil the pervasive presence of black money within the corridors of power. Despite assertions by the government that these bonds would bring transparency to political funding, the recent Supreme Court ruling striking them down as unconstitutional shines a stark light on the enduring issue of cash-driven politics. Electoral bonds were envisioned as a tool to sanitize the flow of funds to political parties by allowing donors to contribute ostensibly anonymously. However, this anonymity proved to be a double-edged sword, as it shielded potential quid pro quos between donors and political recipients. While parties were privy to the identities of their benefactors, the public was left in the dark, rendering the entire system vulnerable to manipulation and corruption. The government's promise that electoral bonds would cleanse the system of unac