Skip to main content

RSS and the VHP against the Vice President of India Hamid Ansari

AAP, New Delhi: The demeaning remarks made by the right wing groups like the RSS and the VHP against the Vice President of India Hamid Ansari is a sad development for the democratic norms and the sacred constitutional framework of the country. The comments made by the right-wing hardliners amounts to the mockery of the Constitution.

“The RSS and VHP has attempted to ridicule the constitution by attacking the Hon. Vice President of India. This is also worrying because top Union Ministers and ruling BJP leaders meet with RSS and its affiliates to take directions in running the politics of the country. This is direct interference of these hard-line groups in the political process and should be condemned by one and all,” AAP leader  Ashutosh said in a press conference here today.

The meeting between Narendra Modi government and RSS is highly questionable. The government is accountable and answerable only to the public. Such a deliberation is a mockery of the constitutional arrangements and parliamentary democracy, Ashutosh added.

RSS was permitted to function as an organization by the first home minister Sardar Vallabhbai Patel under certain conditions. One of them being it will not interfere in the mainstream politics.

It is responsibility of the Prime Minister who is the elected leader of the country to ensure that Ansari does not have to face the vitriol from BJP, RSS and its affiliates. Similar attacks were mounted on Hamid Ansari on the occasions of World Yoga Day and Republic Day by the right wing elements directly as well as through the social media.

Either the Prime Minister should rein in such elements who openly attack the constitutional posts of the country or come clear and declare his inability to control these radical elements whose ambitions are to hijack the secular fabric and democratic sanctity of the country.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's biggest authorized porn industry.

INDIA Today: India's biggest authorized porn industry. Who are exploring Indian women, Indian culture & life through out the world. Pardon me for sharing all these porn pics. But these are from website of AajTak - India's No 1 Hindi channel of India Today Group .....

The Erosion of Democracy: BJP's Stranglehold on Indian Politics

In recent times, India has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic institutions being manipulated and opposition voices being silenced under the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The use of government agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and Income Tax Department (IT) to target opposition leaders has raised serious questions about the health of democracy in the country. The blatant misuse of these agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents undermines the very foundation of democracy. By incarcerating opposition leaders and subjecting them to legal harassment, the BJP government is effectively crushing dissent and monopolizing power. Such tactics not only weaken the democratic fabric of the nation but also erode public trust in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. Furthermore, the stranglehold of the BJP government extends to the media, with reports of censorship and suppression becoming incre

Unmasking the Dark Veil of Electoral Bonds: The Lingering Shadow of Black Money in Indian Politics

By S.B. Mazumder In the convoluted saga of political financing in India, electoral bonds emerged as a promising solution, yet they only served to veil the pervasive presence of black money within the corridors of power. Despite assertions by the government that these bonds would bring transparency to political funding, the recent Supreme Court ruling striking them down as unconstitutional shines a stark light on the enduring issue of cash-driven politics. Electoral bonds were envisioned as a tool to sanitize the flow of funds to political parties by allowing donors to contribute ostensibly anonymously. However, this anonymity proved to be a double-edged sword, as it shielded potential quid pro quos between donors and political recipients. While parties were privy to the identities of their benefactors, the public was left in the dark, rendering the entire system vulnerable to manipulation and corruption. The government's promise that electoral bonds would cleanse the system of unac