Skip to main content

HC directs action against Congress, BJP as foreign funding violates law

The Delhi High Court on Friday directed the home ministry to take action in accordance with law against the Congress and the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP), saying funds received by them from UK-based Vedanta Resources' subsidiaries violates laws.

A division bench of justices Pradeep Nandrajog and Jayant Nath directed authorities to take appropriate action against the two political parties within six months.
The verdict was delivered on a PIL by a NGO, Association for Democratic Reforms, represented by AAP leader Prashant Bhushan, which had alleged that the Ministry of Home Affairs in its reply has factually admitted the position that fundings came to these parties from Vedanta.
The court had reserved its verdict on February 28 after hearing arguments on behalf the NGO, the Centre and both the political parties.
The PIL also filed by EAS Sarma, a former secretary  of the Government of India had sought a direction for a "court-monitored investigation by the Special Investigation Team or the Central Bureau of Investigation into the violation of foreign funding and other laws by major political parties, corporate groups and PSUs.
It had alleged that the two political parties have violated the Representation of People's Act and the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) by taking donations from government companies and foreign sources, which is prohibited under both the legislations.
The petition alleged that Vedanta Resources and its subsidiary companies in India, including Sterlite Industries, Sesa Goa and Malco, "have donated several crores of rupees to major political parties such as the Indian National Congress and the BJP".
The PIL has also alleged that according to Vedanta's annual report of 2012, it had made political donations to the tune of $2.01 million either through a trust or directly in respect of the Indian general elections.
Additional Solicitor General L Nageswara Rao, appearing for the Centre, had opposed the NGO's plea saying donations came from companies listed in India and moreover, the firms have operations here.
Congress and BJP had taken a similar stand that no laws have been violated by them as an Indian held majority stakes in a foreign company, whose Indian subsidiaries gave donations to them.
NGO's counsel Prashant Bhushan had opposed the plea of both the political parties that Anil Agarwal, an Indian, holds more than 50% stakes in the parent UK-based Vedanta Resources and hence, no Indian laws were violated.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's biggest authorized porn industry.

INDIA Today: India's biggest authorized porn industry. Who are exploring Indian women, Indian culture & life through out the world. Pardon me for sharing all these porn pics. But these are from website of AajTak - India's No 1 Hindi channel of India Today Group .....

The Erosion of Democracy: BJP's Stranglehold on Indian Politics

In recent times, India has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic institutions being manipulated and opposition voices being silenced under the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The use of government agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and Income Tax Department (IT) to target opposition leaders has raised serious questions about the health of democracy in the country. The blatant misuse of these agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents undermines the very foundation of democracy. By incarcerating opposition leaders and subjecting them to legal harassment, the BJP government is effectively crushing dissent and monopolizing power. Such tactics not only weaken the democratic fabric of the nation but also erode public trust in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. Furthermore, the stranglehold of the BJP government extends to the media, with reports of censorship and suppression becoming incre

Unmasking the Dark Veil of Electoral Bonds: The Lingering Shadow of Black Money in Indian Politics

By S.B. Mazumder In the convoluted saga of political financing in India, electoral bonds emerged as a promising solution, yet they only served to veil the pervasive presence of black money within the corridors of power. Despite assertions by the government that these bonds would bring transparency to political funding, the recent Supreme Court ruling striking them down as unconstitutional shines a stark light on the enduring issue of cash-driven politics. Electoral bonds were envisioned as a tool to sanitize the flow of funds to political parties by allowing donors to contribute ostensibly anonymously. However, this anonymity proved to be a double-edged sword, as it shielded potential quid pro quos between donors and political recipients. While parties were privy to the identities of their benefactors, the public was left in the dark, rendering the entire system vulnerable to manipulation and corruption. The government's promise that electoral bonds would cleanse the system of unac