Skip to main content

Nayak bhi wahi hai, chehra bhi wahi, is baar nayi patkatha ke saath: Kumar Vishwas blames Shazia Ilmi for latest allegation of molestation

Nayak bhi wahi hai, chehra bhi wahi, is baar nayi patkatha ke saath: Kumar Vishwas blames Shazia Ilmi for latest allegation of molestation


New Delhi: Senior Aam Aadmi Party leader Kumar Vishwas on Saturday rubbished the case filed against him for molestation charges.

The case against Vishwas has been filed by the same woman who, in May this year, had approached the DCW alleging that her life was ruined since the AAP leader was not rebutting “rumours” about their alleged illicit liaison. This had prompted the DCW chairperson Barkha Singh to hold news conference and criticise the AAP leader.
The senior AAP leader said, ” first she wanted me to just issue a clarification as, by her own admission, there was no allegation against me. Now that even the DCW has told the High Court that there was no case against me, this lady has come up with a case of molestation. This is nothing but a cheap ploy by my political rivals.”
He said, he wasn’t overly worried about this new allegation as, according to him, ‘jald hi doodh ka doodh aur paani ka paani ho jaayega.’
Vishwas said, ” is film mein nayak bhi wahi hai, chehra bhi wahi, is baar nayi patkatha ke saath. I know who these people are. These BJP leaders should be courageous and fight their political battle with me openly. What they are doing is utterly cowardice.”
When asked which BJP leader in particular he suspected was behind this, Vishwas said the world knew it was Shazia Ilmi. “Only she can stoop this low,” he added.
Only last month, Delhi High court had dropped all charges against Vishwas after the same girl had approached DCW against him. DCW, then headed by Congress’ Barkha Singh, later informed the Delhi HC that they had dropped all charges against the AAP leader because they couldn’t find anything wrong against him.
It also added that the case against Vishwas was now closed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's biggest authorized porn industry.

INDIA Today: India's biggest authorized porn industry. Who are exploring Indian women, Indian culture & life through out the world. Pardon me for sharing all these porn pics. But these are from website of AajTak - India's No 1 Hindi channel of India Today Group .....

The Erosion of Democracy: BJP's Stranglehold on Indian Politics

In recent times, India has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic institutions being manipulated and opposition voices being silenced under the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The use of government agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and Income Tax Department (IT) to target opposition leaders has raised serious questions about the health of democracy in the country. The blatant misuse of these agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents undermines the very foundation of democracy. By incarcerating opposition leaders and subjecting them to legal harassment, the BJP government is effectively crushing dissent and monopolizing power. Such tactics not only weaken the democratic fabric of the nation but also erode public trust in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. Furthermore, the stranglehold of the BJP government extends to the media, with reports of censorship and suppression becoming incre

Unmasking the Dark Veil of Electoral Bonds: The Lingering Shadow of Black Money in Indian Politics

By S.B. Mazumder In the convoluted saga of political financing in India, electoral bonds emerged as a promising solution, yet they only served to veil the pervasive presence of black money within the corridors of power. Despite assertions by the government that these bonds would bring transparency to political funding, the recent Supreme Court ruling striking them down as unconstitutional shines a stark light on the enduring issue of cash-driven politics. Electoral bonds were envisioned as a tool to sanitize the flow of funds to political parties by allowing donors to contribute ostensibly anonymously. However, this anonymity proved to be a double-edged sword, as it shielded potential quid pro quos between donors and political recipients. While parties were privy to the identities of their benefactors, the public was left in the dark, rendering the entire system vulnerable to manipulation and corruption. The government's promise that electoral bonds would cleanse the system of unac