Skip to main content

Lokpal 2.0 to get more teeth: AAP gets ready to unveil new and improved anti-corruption bill

By Darpan Singh: The Aam Aadmi Party government will bring its Jan Lokpal Bill to set up an ombudsman to investigate corruption charges against politicians and civil servants in the Monsoon Session of the Delhi Assembly that is likely to take place in August.

To recall, AAP had decided to end its 49-day rule and quit power in February 2014 when the minority government failed to table the previous version of the Bill in the Assembly.

Both BJP and Congress had opposed the Bill saying its tabling was “unconstitutional” as the Centre had not vetted it.

Centre’s nod awaited

This time, the Bill has been tweaked to be stronger, and also more contentious, setting off fears of a bitter confrontation with the Centre, whose nod is a must for the half-state of Delhi to pass any such legislation.

The revised version, apart from other provisions, also looks at greater powers over Delhi’s ACB (anti-corruption branch), an institution currently caught in legal and political battles between the Delhi government and Centre.

AAP says it has people’s mandate (67 Assembly seats out of 70) to run the city the way it wants to.

The Centre cites constitutional provisions to control issues of public order and transfer posting of senior bureaucrats.

AAP spokesperson Dilip Pandey said, “The draft is almost ready. It will become more stringent. Tweaking is being done in the light of the Centre’s attempts to control the ACB and interfere into issues of transfer and posting. Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal himself is monitoring the whole process."

More than four months into office, the government claims it has done its homework and Kejriwal’s showpiece legislation will not face any hurdles this time.

Delhi government’s spokesperson Nagendra Sharma said, “We will send the draft to the Centre first; they will convey their objections, if any, including possibilities of our Bill violating any national Law. I don’t think it will be stalled again.”

The Bill was a key demand of social activist Anna Hazare’s anti-graft movement which gave birth to Kejriwal-led AAP.

But there has been criticism from BJP and Congress that AAP has in its second avatar been quiet about the Bill.

In fact, there has been no Lokayukta after the last one, Manmohan Sarin, retired in November 2013.

About 450 corruption cases have piled up since then.

“The institution of Lokayukta has no teeth. It only has recommendatory powers. Why have a replacement when we are going to repeal the current Act and bring a much stronger ombudsman,” said Sharma.

The new office will have the powers to prosecute even the chief minister.

Trials have to finish in six months.

Those found guilty will serve a jail term of one year to life imprisonment.

Property seizures and dismissal from office may also happen.

“Arvind himself started work on the Bill on April 5. This time we’re making the whole procedure water tight and foolproof. We will follow all the so-called rules. There could not be a timeline but the Bill is likely to be tabled in the monsoon session.Last time we didn’t have the numbers in the Assembly. That’s taken care of by the people of Delhi,” Pandey said.

Once the draft is final, the Delhi government’s law department will take a look before it is sent to the state Cabinet.

The 33-page Delhi Jan-lokpal Bill, 2014 will then be sent to the Centre via Delhi’s Lt Governor Najeeb Jung for vetting.

The home ministry will seek law ministry’s opinion before sending it back to Jung with suggestions for changes if needed.

It is Jung who has to green light it to be tabled in the Assembly. When passed, it would need presidential assent.

And the passage does not seem easy.

Jung, who reports to the Centre, had in 2014 himself objected to the tabling of the previous Bill, saying it was in contravention of constitutional procedures.

AAP and Jung are locked in a bitter legal and political row for greater control over Delhi.

The Centre is not at ease with a Delhi law acting against central government officials.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's biggest authorized porn industry.

INDIA Today: India's biggest authorized porn industry. Who are exploring Indian women, Indian culture & life through out the world. Pardon me for sharing all these porn pics. But these are from website of AajTak - India's No 1 Hindi channel of India Today Group .....

The Erosion of Democracy: BJP's Stranglehold on Indian Politics

In recent times, India has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic institutions being manipulated and opposition voices being silenced under the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The use of government agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and Income Tax Department (IT) to target opposition leaders has raised serious questions about the health of democracy in the country. The blatant misuse of these agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents undermines the very foundation of democracy. By incarcerating opposition leaders and subjecting them to legal harassment, the BJP government is effectively crushing dissent and monopolizing power. Such tactics not only weaken the democratic fabric of the nation but also erode public trust in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. Furthermore, the stranglehold of the BJP government extends to the media, with reports of censorship and suppression becoming incre

Unmasking the Dark Veil of Electoral Bonds: The Lingering Shadow of Black Money in Indian Politics

By S.B. Mazumder In the convoluted saga of political financing in India, electoral bonds emerged as a promising solution, yet they only served to veil the pervasive presence of black money within the corridors of power. Despite assertions by the government that these bonds would bring transparency to political funding, the recent Supreme Court ruling striking them down as unconstitutional shines a stark light on the enduring issue of cash-driven politics. Electoral bonds were envisioned as a tool to sanitize the flow of funds to political parties by allowing donors to contribute ostensibly anonymously. However, this anonymity proved to be a double-edged sword, as it shielded potential quid pro quos between donors and political recipients. While parties were privy to the identities of their benefactors, the public was left in the dark, rendering the entire system vulnerable to manipulation and corruption. The government's promise that electoral bonds would cleanse the system of unac