Skip to main content

AAP to bring Jan Lokpal Bill back on table

The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP): Started working on the Jan Lokpal Bill that had brought an end to the 49-day Arvind Kejriwal-led government in 2014.

According to sources, a review of the draft prepared the last time is on and a decision to bring more departments under it will be taken soon.

“The draft is already there and the administrative reforms department has been asked whether any changes are required. Once finalized, the bill will be cleared by the cabinet,” said a Delhi government official, requesting anonymity.

Sources said the bill will be tabled in the budget session that will be held by the end of May or the first week of June. 

The name of the Bill — either Janlokpal or Delhi Lokayukta — will be known only when the draft goes through the cabinet. The draft is largely based on the Uttarakhand Lokayukta Bill.

“It differs in some regards. The inclusion of the chief minister office in the purview of the proposed law is one major difference,” the official added.

Officials said that Janlokpal bill would ensure that investigation of corruption charges and prosecution was done under fast track conditions within six months.

“If found guilty, corrupt officials will serve a jail term of 1 year to life imprisonment depending on the severity of the case. Their property will be seized and they will be dismissed from office,” said the official.

After assuming office on December 28 in 2013, Arvind Kejriwal had said his government would pass the promised JanLokpal Bill from Ramlila Ground by the first week of February in 2014.

A committee headed by the chief secretary and secretaries of urban development, law and finance departments and advocate Rahul Mehra were given the responsibility of drafting the Jan Lokpal Bill.

Arvind Kejriwal had earlier resigned because the bill could not be tabled. In its election manifesto for the Delhi assembly election, Aam Aadmi Party had promised to cover all the officials and employees of the Delhi Government, from the chief minister to MLAs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's biggest authorized porn industry.

INDIA Today: India's biggest authorized porn industry. Who are exploring Indian women, Indian culture & life through out the world. Pardon me for sharing all these porn pics. But these are from website of AajTak - India's No 1 Hindi channel of India Today Group .....

The Erosion of Democracy: BJP's Stranglehold on Indian Politics

In recent times, India has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic institutions being manipulated and opposition voices being silenced under the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The use of government agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and Income Tax Department (IT) to target opposition leaders has raised serious questions about the health of democracy in the country. The blatant misuse of these agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents undermines the very foundation of democracy. By incarcerating opposition leaders and subjecting them to legal harassment, the BJP government is effectively crushing dissent and monopolizing power. Such tactics not only weaken the democratic fabric of the nation but also erode public trust in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. Furthermore, the stranglehold of the BJP government extends to the media, with reports of censorship and suppression becoming incre

Unmasking the Dark Veil of Electoral Bonds: The Lingering Shadow of Black Money in Indian Politics

By S.B. Mazumder In the convoluted saga of political financing in India, electoral bonds emerged as a promising solution, yet they only served to veil the pervasive presence of black money within the corridors of power. Despite assertions by the government that these bonds would bring transparency to political funding, the recent Supreme Court ruling striking them down as unconstitutional shines a stark light on the enduring issue of cash-driven politics. Electoral bonds were envisioned as a tool to sanitize the flow of funds to political parties by allowing donors to contribute ostensibly anonymously. However, this anonymity proved to be a double-edged sword, as it shielded potential quid pro quos between donors and political recipients. While parties were privy to the identities of their benefactors, the public was left in the dark, rendering the entire system vulnerable to manipulation and corruption. The government's promise that electoral bonds would cleanse the system of unac