Skip to main content

A Charge Against AAP of Foreign Funding That Doesn't Stick

NEW DELHI:  A donation made to the AAm Aadmi Party or aap xx years ago by a businessman in Canada was bonafide, his wife told NDTV today.

On December 5, 2014, JK Mann donated a thousand dollars to the party led by Arvind Kejriwal. A group that split from the party last year, and calls itself AVAM, had alleged this morning that the money was paid by cheque, and allowed money laundering for a dubious Canadian entity.

The allegations of money laundering against the Aam Aadmi Party by its breakaway faction suffered a major dent today as one of the donors came forth to say she had indeed made a donation and there was nothing irregular about it.
This morning, the AAP Volunteer Action March, or AVAM, claimed a donation of $1000 that AAP received from one J K Mann was actually hawala money from a certain Canadian entity, Julio Oulovski.
"My husband or I have no idea who this Julio Oulovski is," Jaskirat Mann, wife of JK Mann, told NDTV.

She said her husband was a Canadian citizen and the donation was indeed made from Canada. But she had made the donation through her credit card and not by cheque, as AVAM has claimed.

Ms Mann, an Indian citizen who is home on a visit, said she was shocked to discover AVAM's charges from media reports.

"I saw my name on the cheque. People should find out if this has been deposited or not," she said. "Someone is trying to defame Kejriwal."

This morning, Gopal Goyal of AVAM told the media that a disgruntled AAP supporter had given them the details of the suspicious transaction. Another AVAM member, Neil Francis Haslam, said AAP had been laundering money from "foreign countries in a big way".

On Monday, the group, which had broken away from AAP last year, alleged that AAP had been funded by four dubious companies.

The controversy, coming a few days ahead of the crucial Delhi elections, had been a blow to AAP, which had earlier taken apart political rivals over corruption charges.

The party has denied all accusations of wrongdoing.  "If the companies raised that money through some sort of violations, how are we responsible for that?" party chief Arvind Kejriwal had told NDTV.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's biggest authorized porn industry.

INDIA Today: India's biggest authorized porn industry. Who are exploring Indian women, Indian culture & life through out the world. Pardon me for sharing all these porn pics. But these are from website of AajTak - India's No 1 Hindi channel of India Today Group .....

The Erosion of Democracy: BJP's Stranglehold on Indian Politics

In recent times, India has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic institutions being manipulated and opposition voices being silenced under the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The use of government agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and Income Tax Department (IT) to target opposition leaders has raised serious questions about the health of democracy in the country. The blatant misuse of these agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents undermines the very foundation of democracy. By incarcerating opposition leaders and subjecting them to legal harassment, the BJP government is effectively crushing dissent and monopolizing power. Such tactics not only weaken the democratic fabric of the nation but also erode public trust in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. Furthermore, the stranglehold of the BJP government extends to the media, with reports of censorship and suppression becoming incre

Unmasking the Dark Veil of Electoral Bonds: The Lingering Shadow of Black Money in Indian Politics

By S.B. Mazumder In the convoluted saga of political financing in India, electoral bonds emerged as a promising solution, yet they only served to veil the pervasive presence of black money within the corridors of power. Despite assertions by the government that these bonds would bring transparency to political funding, the recent Supreme Court ruling striking them down as unconstitutional shines a stark light on the enduring issue of cash-driven politics. Electoral bonds were envisioned as a tool to sanitize the flow of funds to political parties by allowing donors to contribute ostensibly anonymously. However, this anonymity proved to be a double-edged sword, as it shielded potential quid pro quos between donors and political recipients. While parties were privy to the identities of their benefactors, the public was left in the dark, rendering the entire system vulnerable to manipulation and corruption. The government's promise that electoral bonds would cleanse the system of unac