Skip to main content

Arvind Kejriwal trailing behind Narendra Modi by 50,000 votes in Varanasi: AAP's survey

Aam Aadmi Party workers in Varanasi prepare ahead of the high-profile battle between Arvind Kejriwal and Narendra Modi. (photo: Rajesh Kumar)
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) on Wednesday opened its war room in Varanasi's Mahmoorganj area, opening up a new front in the high-profile battle between party supremo Arvind Kejriwal and BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi. 

As part of its first activity, the AAP cited its own survey covering 80,000 households out of the total 3.14 lakh in Varanasi and said Kejriwal was trailing behind Modi by 50,000 votes.

Kejriwal's campaign manager Gopal Mohan said, "It's not a small achievement. When we started our campaign, we were trailing by 2 lakh votes. We will wipe out this deficit in 10 days."

But reaching out to people is proving to be a tough task. AAP's target is at each household at least three times. By now, the first round (3.14 lakh) should have been complete.

There are five – three urban and two rural -- assembly segments in Varanasi parliamentary constituency. Five persons have been given the job of winning it for Kejriwal. They are Manish Sisodia, Dileep Pandey, Durgesh Pathak, Kapil Mishra and Gulab Singh.

Read: We thought people would praise our decision to quit Delhi govt: Kejriwal

"During his stay in Varanasi, Kejriwal will essentially focus on corner meetings and padyatras. During the last five days of campaigning, he will do road shows and address big gatherings.  Our budget does not allow us for big outdoor publicity campaign," said Mohan.

AAP's budget for Varanasi campaign is Rs. 25-30 lakh. Donations made to Kejriwal so far total to Rs. 40 lakh. Upper limit for campaign expenditure for him or other candidates is Rs. 70 lakh.

AAP hopes Modi may not be able to spend much time in Varanasi because of his packed campaign schedule. This may help Kejriwal establish closer contact with locals.  Currently, Kejriwal is covering villages in Rohania and Sevapuri, the two rural segments in Varanasi.

Shalini Gupta, organisation development adviser for AAP, said, "We call  this place the nerve-centre. Our main activities include volunteer management, legal works, social media and publicity."

"Our main strength is our 10,000 local volunteers. About 3,000 have registered themselves to come here from outside," Gupta said.  AAP is also getting volunteers from Gujarat. ""When people in Varanasi hear  the truth of Gujarat from the people of Gujarat, they would know the real Modi. It's one of our main strategies," said a party source.

Mohan, who also ran Kejriwal's campaign when he defeated then Delhi chief minister Sheila Dikshit by a huge margin, admitted that it is "a difficult battle. There we had time. We had presence in Delhi. It was a more urban setting. It helped us. But we're still confident of a very good show here," said Mohan.

But people here do not seem to be taking AAP too seriously.

"I don't see Kejriwal threatening Modi. But even if AAP does well and loses it can cash it on and go to people during Delhi and Haryana assembly polls slated later this year with head held high," said Hareram Sharma, a resident of chowk area.  The BJP has won this seat five out of six times since 1991.

Of the 16,00,000 voters, 300,000 are Muslims.

With Mukhtar Ansari deciding against contesting from Varanasi, trying to avoid a major split in the Muslim vote bank,  AAP is hopeful of an inroad. But the party keeps distancing itself from Ansari for obvious reasons. Another beneficiary may be Congress nominee Ajay Rai.

In the 2009 Lok Sabha elections, as BSP nominee Ansari got 1.85 lakh votes, losing to BJP's Murli Manohar Joshi only by about 17,000 votes.

Nomination filing would begin on April 17 and the polling would take place on May 12.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India's biggest authorized porn industry.

INDIA Today: India's biggest authorized porn industry. Who are exploring Indian women, Indian culture & life through out the world. Pardon me for sharing all these porn pics. But these are from website of AajTak - India's No 1 Hindi channel of India Today Group .....

The Erosion of Democracy: BJP's Stranglehold on Indian Politics

In recent times, India has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic institutions being manipulated and opposition voices being silenced under the leadership of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The use of government agencies such as the Enforcement Directorate (ED), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), and Income Tax Department (IT) to target opposition leaders has raised serious questions about the health of democracy in the country. The blatant misuse of these agencies to harass and intimidate political opponents undermines the very foundation of democracy. By incarcerating opposition leaders and subjecting them to legal harassment, the BJP government is effectively crushing dissent and monopolizing power. Such tactics not only weaken the democratic fabric of the nation but also erode public trust in the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. Furthermore, the stranglehold of the BJP government extends to the media, with reports of censorship and suppression becoming incre

Unmasking the Dark Veil of Electoral Bonds: The Lingering Shadow of Black Money in Indian Politics

By S.B. Mazumder In the convoluted saga of political financing in India, electoral bonds emerged as a promising solution, yet they only served to veil the pervasive presence of black money within the corridors of power. Despite assertions by the government that these bonds would bring transparency to political funding, the recent Supreme Court ruling striking them down as unconstitutional shines a stark light on the enduring issue of cash-driven politics. Electoral bonds were envisioned as a tool to sanitize the flow of funds to political parties by allowing donors to contribute ostensibly anonymously. However, this anonymity proved to be a double-edged sword, as it shielded potential quid pro quos between donors and political recipients. While parties were privy to the identities of their benefactors, the public was left in the dark, rendering the entire system vulnerable to manipulation and corruption. The government's promise that electoral bonds would cleanse the system of unac